Skip to content

Run a pilot

Documentation Index

Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.sourcery.ai/llms.txt

Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

A pilot runs Sourcery on your real pull requests for the length of the trial. At the end you’ll know whether it caught bugs the team would have missed, and whether review got faster.

Before you connect anything, agree on what a good result looks like. The dashboards answer these questions, so pick your criteria from them:

Write down the result you’d need to see against each one. You’ll come back to it at the end.

In-app chat is on every dashboard page, and during a pilot it’s the fastest way to reach us. If a finding looks wrong or you can’t find a setting, ask there. You can also email support@sourcery.ai.

The pilot uses Analytics and on-demand security scans, both Team plan features. Signing in with GitHub or GitLab starts a Team trial. If your account is on a Pro trial, switch it to Team on the Billing page.

Connect the repositories you want to evaluate with the quickstart for your platform. Sourcery reviews every new pull request from then on.

Start a security scan too. Open Repositories and click Start Scan.

Everyone in your organization has access during the trial. Invite the engineers who open and review pull requests in the pilot repositories, and whoever will act on the security findings.

Sourcery reviews sensibly out of the box, and you can configure it further. Open Review Settings to choose what it posts and which pull requests it reviews. Write your team’s recurring conventions as review rules. Set these up at the start. The results then reflect how your team runs Sourcery.

Go back to the criteria you wrote down and read each one off the dashboards.

The Analytics page shows the code-review numbers. It’s available for GitHub; if you’re piloting on GitLab, read the code-review results from the reviews on the merge requests themselves.

Sourcery Acceptance Rate, on the Overview tab, is the share of Sourcery’s comments that led to a code change. It shows whether the comments are worth acting on.

Median Cycle Time and Time to First Review, both on the Overview tab, show whether review got faster. Each shows the change against the previous period.

The Security Reports page covers the scan, on GitHub and GitLab alike. The Risk Impact tab shows Open Issues and the breakdown by severity, from Critical down to Low. The Trends tab shows New against Resolved, the findings that came in during the pilot and the ones that got fixed.

The report counts findings and can’t tell you which ones are false positives. Judge that yourself on a sample.

Near the end of the pilot, ask the engineers whether the comments were worth reading. If the team wants to keep Sourcery, that tells you as much as any number.

If Jira is your tracker, add Jira autocreate to the pilot. If your engineers fix issues with coding agents, try agent fix prompts.

Costs shouldn’t be a surprise at the end of a pilot. Pricing is public on the plans page.